![]() "Frontline workers need to be protected and this decision needlessly ignores that there was a better way to address this issue without negating this mandate," Marc Perrone, president of the UFCW International, said in a statement. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, the largest union for grocery workers and meatpacking plants, said the Supreme Court decision fails to recognize the "extreme health risks" America's frontline food and retail workers face on the job. Workers also need better access to testing and protective equipment, the union said. The SEIU called on Congress and states to pass laws requiring vaccinations, masks and paid sick leave. ![]() "In blocking the vaccine-or-test rule for large employers, the court has placed millions of other essential workers further at risk, caving to corporations that are trying to rig the rules against workers permanently," the union said. The Service Employees International Union, which represents more than 2 million service industry workers, said the Supreme Court's decision is a relief for health care workers but leaves others without critical protections. The United Auto Workers, which encourages workers to get vaccinated, said the decision won't change safety protocols such as face masks, temperature checks and social distancing when possible for more than 150,000 union members working at factories owned by General Motors, Ford and Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler). "This decision will have no impact on most professional and white-collar workers, but it will endanger millions of frontline workers who risk their lives daily and who are least able to protect themselves," said David Michaels, who led OSHA during the Obama administration and now teaches at George Washington University's School of Public Health. Many labor advocates were dismayed by the ruling. salaried employees who are already vaccinated." The car maker said it would review the court decision to see if it needs to change a requirement that most of its U.S. But companies that used mandates to achieve relatively high vaccination rates may decide that they have accomplished enough.įord Motor said it was "encouraged by the 88% of U.S. "If your priority is the economy, or your own health, or the health of others, you would agree with my approach," Simons said.Īdministration officials believe that even though the OSHA rule has been blocked, it drove millions of people to get vaccinated in the interim. Karen Harned, an official with the National Federation of Independent Business, said that as smaller businesses employing more than 100 people try to recover from nearly two years of pandemic, "the last thing they need is a mandate that would cause more business challenges."īut mandate supporters called it a matter of safety for employees and customers.ĭan Simons, co-owner of the Founding Farmers chain of restaurants in the Washington area, said vaccine mandates are "common sense." He requires his 1,000 employees to be fully vaccinated those who request an exemption must wear a mask and submit weekly COVID test results. The National Retail Federation, the nation's largest retail trade organization and one of the business groups that challenged the OSHA action, called the court's decision "a significant victory for employers." It complained that OSHA acted without first allowing public comments, although administration officials met with many business and labor groups before issuing the rule.Ĭhris Spear, the president of the American Trucking Associations, another of the groups that fought the OSHA rule, said it "would interfere with individuals' private health care decisions." ![]() "Lawsuits on both mandates will move forward, and lower courts will have their say next." "These decisions will not be the last word," employment litigation attorney Peter Glennon, said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |